What is the point in globalising finance companies first thrusting the devoloping countries into it. when all the money of the developing countires are gone in the hands of insurance and credit card companies of the developing countires, what is it left for the third world countries. Agriculture is protected with subsidies in U.S and most developed countries. why not globalise them first instead of coke and pepsi? Why not have the free flow of labour as the first agenda in the globalisation rather having it as last. Would they be with drawing that agenda in the end when all the wanted to squander has been done?
-
Recent Posts
Tags
advertising arts business career Careers computer computers Customer e education entertainment facebook Fake family Fashion Finance Go golf health hobbies home hr In internet Is It leisure marketing new online business Or recreation Self Improvement service technology The trade travel Travel & Leisure Tweet update w week What yRecent Comments
- greenjellee on Arnold Schwarzenegger gives advice for careers in Hollywood
- mancat1980 on Arnold Schwarzenegger gives advice for careers in Hollywood
- Brady2k10 on Arnold Schwarzenegger gives advice for careers in Hollywood
- jason1309 on Arnold Schwarzenegger gives advice for careers in Hollywood
- kabfik on Arnold Schwarzenegger gives advice for careers in Hollywood
Tag cloud
trade arts new hobbies hr Travel & Leisure computer Is Fake travel leisure The Or entertainment facebook Careers Fashion In marketing Self Improvement week internet e Go y golf technology online business What Finance career computers advertising service recreation Customer business w health family education Tweet update home It
Corporations don`t have feelings, they are not people.
I answered this before but thought id cash in on both lots of points
I think that it is becaue the fincance companies already have the funds to set up to globalise were as agricultre don’t. Also it is all happening just as Marx predicted. Soon there will be nothing left of the finance companies or the big rich wheelers and dealers. And then the agricultural labourors will be a ok.
Why should there be free movement of labor at all? Those in developed countries who subsidize their own people to get a decent education can’t afford to subsidize the poor of the world. The same problem exists for health care and all of the other services the middle and upper classes subsidize for the poor legally in their countries. If that is the price of globalization, I don’t need globalization.